Bitbucket vs Git comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
9,726 views|7,171 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Git Logo
Read 35 Git reviews
2,190 views|2,035 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket vs. Git Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access.""The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management.""Bitbucket works, and it's reliable""Code check in and code version control.""We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically.""Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature.""The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us.""We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."

More Bitbucket Pros →

"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten.""The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good.""You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.""The implementation is easy.""I use the solution for website management.""The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality.""The initial setup is very easy."

More Git Pros →

Cons
"Technical support is not very fast.""The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions.""In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider.""It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises.""Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash.""The module component needs improvement.""Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat. My other issue is that Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and all the other ones use slightly different jargon for the same things. They should come up with a standard language for all these tools.""I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."

More Bitbucket Cons →

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved.""Git's user interface could be improved.""If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful.""The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure.""There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git.""Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface.""Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents.""In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

More Git Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
  • "With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
  • "Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
  • "We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
  • "I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
  • "I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
  • "Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
  • "When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
  • More Bitbucket Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
  • "There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."
  • "This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."
  • "Git is completely free."
  • "As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."
  • "I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."
  • "The tool is an open-source product."
  • "We use the open-source version."
  • More Git Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
    Top Answer:In a small-scale company where I previously worked, cost-saving measures led to a transition from GitLab's dedicated servers to GitHub's cloud-based solution. This switch resulted in significant cost… more »
    Top Answer:The product could be less expensive for small companies.
    Top Answer:You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.
    Top Answer:The tool is not expensive. I rate the pricing a three or four out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:I would like to see less updates with the product.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    9,726
    Comparisons
    7,171
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    8.4
    4th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    2,190
    Comparisons
    2,035
    Reviews
    33
    Average Words per Review
    300
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Bitbucket Server logo
    Compared 72% of the time.
    AWS CodeCommit logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    GitHub logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Atlassian SourceTree logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Atlassian SourceTree logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Canonical Bazaar logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    IBM Rational ClearCase logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Surround SCM logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Learn More
    Git
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.

    There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:

    1. Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version of Bitbucket that is hosted on Atlassian's servers and accessible via a URL. Pipelines, an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool in Bitbucket Cloud, allows you to create, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.

    2. Bitbucket Server is installed on your computer and runs in your environment. Bamboo, our robust CI/CD platform, has strong connections with Bitbucket Server, allowing you to totally automate your workflow. The license is unlimited.

    3. Bitbucket Data Center appears to users as a single instance of Bitbucket Server, but it is actually hosted on a cluster of servers in your environment.
    4. This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:

    • Availability: If one cluster node fails, the remaining cluster node(s) can continue to service requests, resulting in little or no downtime for customers.
    • Performance at scale: A cluster of numerous Bitbucket Server-running machines can manage more traffic than a single system.
    • Mirroring: For distributed teams working with large repositories, smart mirroring can increase Git clone performance.

    Bitbucket Features

    Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Workflow control: This helps you to enforce a project or team workflow.
    • Cooperation: Pull requests with inline commentary for code review cooperation.
    • Customization: If you don't find what you're looking for in our Marketplace, you can use our full Rest API to create unique features for your workflow.
    • Jira and Trello integration: Bring order to the chaos and keep the entire software company informed. Access to Jira issues and Trello cards' branches, build status, commits, and status.
    • Code collaboration: From concept to cloud, code collaboration is a must. Create a merging checklist with designated approvers and check for passing builds before transitioning Jira issues based on pull request status.
    • Consistent delivery: With built-in continuous delivery, you can build and test automatically. Build, test, and deploy with Bitbucket Pipelines, our integrated CI/CD solution. Benefit from code-based configuration and quick feedback loops.
    • Simple deployment: Keep track of your deployments, preview them, and confidently promote them.
    • Code security: You can rest easy knowing your code is safe on the cloud, and you can use checks to prevent errors from occurring.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”

    Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."

    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.
    Sample Customers
    Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
    Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government9%
    Media Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization43%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise49%
    Large Enterprise41%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Bitbucket vs. Git
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Git and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub and Atlassian SourceTree, whereas Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase and Surround SCM. See our Bitbucket vs. Git report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.