We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management."
"Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"
"Code check in and code version control."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature."
"The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us."
"We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."
"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."
"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."
"The implementation is easy."
"I use the solution for website management."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"Technical support is not very fast."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider."
"It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises."
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
"The module component needs improvement."
"Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat. My other issue is that Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and all the other ones use slightly different jargon for the same things. They should come up with a standard language for all these tools."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."
"Git's user interface could be improved."
"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."
"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."
"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."
"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."
"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub and Atlassian SourceTree, whereas Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase and Surround SCM. See our Bitbucket vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.