We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"I have found Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra to be highly scalable."
"The tool's graphical user interface is common and very friendly, making it an overall user-friendly product."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"It was easy to set up."
"The advantage of the solution is that it has a console on the cloud and you can update the clients."
"The most valuable features are the solution's thorough detection and ease of use."
"It efficiently investigates security incidents."
"One strong point is that it doesn't have many background services running on the Windows system or server operating system. This minimizes impact because it's a lighter version."
"The solution is stable."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"Automatic user recovery prior to Windows booting up."
"One valuable feature is Threat Prevention with the on-demand scan."
"The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable."
"The manageability of the product itself is its most valuable aspect. You have the underlying EPO, and on top of it, you can deploy the various components as you require. This is unlike other solutions like Symantec where you have to deploy everything or nothing. With this solution, you can choose to only deploy antivirus or only deploy a firewall, or only something else. I choose the components and that deployment is done through EPO. It makes manageability very flexible."
"The installation is pretty straightforward."
"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."
"The solution is not stable."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"The support needs improvement."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"While the solution is secure, it could have better integration."
"They were working on the encryption management for laptops, and if they complete it then it would be helpful."
"Bitfender could improve their modules on the server. For example, Bitdefender doesn't have content filters or firewall modules on the server. It would be great if it had a networking module and a content filter module at the workstations."
"This solution would be improved if it included antivirus functionality. You currently need to install a plug-in to Outlook for each email to be scanned."
"The main area for improvement is the dashboard of the cloud console, where we manage security policies and groupings. It needs to be more flexible and informative."
"If we could directly push the agent to the script, it'll be very good."
"Using this product requires quite a bit of training, which is hard to get."
"There's room for improvement in terms of protection. That's my primary concern."
"It would be helpful if the controlling of connections coming to the PC could be done from McAfee's side so that we can block those connections."
"While we are pleased with the endpoint solution, there should also be a separate one for the firewall."
"The solution needs to offer better local technical support."
"The solution has problematic encryption, which needs reforming."
"The management console is a little bit difficult to understand for admins. You need a lot of time in order to become familiar with that. It is a little bit complicated and not too easy to understand. Its price can also be improved. Its price is higher than its competitors. McAfee also needs to have better cloud integration and more data centers in the EU. The cloud center should be in Europe or in Germany. In Germany, it is really important to have access to your data within the same country. Customer data needs to be placed and processed in the same country."
"Currently, Trellix Endpoint Security can't find the running mutexes, while other open-source products can do it."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"They can make it free, but that's not going to happen."
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 14th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 55 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Intercept X Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and CylancePROTECT. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.