We performed a comparison between Bitrix24 and Trello based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Offers, a free version."
"Collaboration and CRM are the most valuable features of Bitrix24."
"The product is user-friendly."
"I am impressed with the solution's ability to customize workflows."
"We are considering Bitrix24 as an office automation solution for our workplace productivity-related issues, project management activities, and staff tracking."
"The technical support was intuitive and had good documentation."
"It is easy to use and very stable."
"It is a very scalable solution...The tool currently operates efficiently and contributes to our ongoing digitization efforts, including documentation and workflows."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I appreciate the ease of creating boards and the flexibility it offers."
"The solution is very user-friendly, where you have everything you need."
"Projects do not take as long and meetings take less time, since you know the status of developments or tests."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and flexible while offering the ease of use of drag-and-drop functionality for each task."
"Kanban is the best feature of the tool."
"While Nasuni has a learning curve, it becomes user-friendly once mastered."
"The installation was extremely straightforward."
"Some functionalities of the tool required specific expertise. For example, the SIP Connector is difficult to install."
"In our organization, we feel that the UI and the functionalities for workflows in the solution need a lot of improvement."
"It would be great if colleagues could get alerts via email when they are assigned something."
"Compared to Microsoft, we found Bitrix24 a little complex because it's new to us, and we don't understand it much."
"We didn't have the ability to customize the solution."
"In my opinion, everything needs improvement. It all starts with the user experience. It's extremely difficult to use, it's always lagging, It doesn't look particularly appealing, in terms of how it looks, and it is extremely difficult to locate the stages."
"I would like to see improvements with Bitrix24's marketing automation."
"The solution’s performance could be made faster."
"It would be good if we could update the project status by email without logging into Trello."
"The solution could be priced cheaper."
"As a team board it did not work well for us."
"Sometimes the notifications are not updated on iOS."
"Trello was a little complicated initially because we didn't know how to use it, create a product backlog, or define the work items."
"In terms of improvements, adding more artificial intelligence and making it more user-friendly in terms of design could be beneficial."
"The product is not easy to use."
"It would be great if there was a tour for new users to explain how this solution works. Using this solution for the first time can feel complicated."
Bitrix24 is ranked 12th in Project Management Software with 18 reviews while Trello is ranked 8th in Project Management Software with 39 reviews. Bitrix24 is rated 7.4, while Trello is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bitrix24 writes "A project management tool that offers great scalability and stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trello writes "The solution is easy to set up, extremely stable, and is available on multiple devices". Bitrix24 is most compared with Zoho CRM, Asana, Odoo, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Notion, whereas Trello is most compared with Asana, Wrike, Jira, monday.com and Microsoft Project Server. See our Bitrix24 vs. Trello report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
