We performed a comparison between Bizagi vs.Camunda Platform based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions received very positive reviews from users. Bizagi has the winning edge in this comparison because of users’ reports of easier deployment and better support.
"Very, very stable."
"The initial setup is super simple."
"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."
"The user interface is pretty good."
"I like that Bizagi is fully compatible with BPMN 2.0. It also eases the way in which we work with BPMN 2.0 itself, which is a comprehensive and rather complex notation standard."
"The most valuable feature is the simulation."
"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."
"Very user friendly and a professional solution."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"The best feature is the automation."
"Can be difficult for new users."
"Agriculture, Industry."
"I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected."
"Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment."
"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."
"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The documentation could use improvement."
Bizagi is ranked 5th in Business Process Design with 78 reviews while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Bizagi is most compared with Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps, ARIS BPA and Appian, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, IBM BPM, Appian and Bonita. See our Bizagi vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
I have been using Camunda and BizAgi, amongst some others, during an evaluation.
Both are easy to use. My business peers tended towards Camunda because we would get a native language speaking support (in German). (However, for very other reasons we did choose something very different).
Hi, i have not use Camunda platform yet