We performed a comparison between Bizagi and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It automates a completely manual, complicated process."
"The most valuable feature is the simulation."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations."
"I like that Bizagi is fully compatible with BPMN 2.0. It also eases the way in which we work with BPMN 2.0 itself, which is a comprehensive and rather complex notation standard."
"It has an easy to use interface which final users accepted with much more enthusiasm than our ERP (SAP)."
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"Microsoft PowerApps allows you to simplify business processes and user experience. You can also create responsive applications and canvas apps through this solution. It's an easy to scale, stable, and low-code solution."
"It’s a stable product."
"It is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that PowerApps can be used by most business users. It is not only for programmers."
"When I am developing any user UI, it gives me complete flexibility. I can manage in any way I want."
"We were impressed with the functionality of the solution."
"The speed of the solution is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is automized processes."
"Bizagi doesn't have integrations with other solutions, such as ERP systems. In the industry and your company, you have a lot of systems with which you need to integrate, but Bizagi doesn't have such integrations, which makes it very difficult. Its scalability can also be improved. It is good for a startup, but when you need something more complex, it is not good."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"Can be difficult for new users."
"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."
"There could be more documentation."
"The solution's interface could be a bit more user-friendly and I would like to see more integrations with other Office products, not just Office 365."
"Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"You can't add too many filters onto anything you build, otherwise, it will be very slow and it will affect your performance."
"They probably need to improve intelligent document processing."
"The portal and canvas apps need to be improved and brought up to speed."
"There is room for improvement with the amount of code required to implement the expense classification app."
"Can be improved to cater to complex developments."
"We use GoCanvas to make forms. It's easier to make forms in GoCanvas, but Power Apps is cheaper because it is bundled with our Office 365 license. if I want to create a form in Power Apps, I need some knowledge, but GoCanvas is intuitive."
"The solution could improve by having more connectors for different solutions in a way to create custom connectors. Additionally, they should make HTTP Connectors free again because it was not always a premium feature. These HTTP connectors allow you to send API requests which can be important."
"The solution should have more integration with other platforms."
Bizagi is ranked 13th in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, ARIS BPA and Appian, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Mendix, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Appian and Zoho Creator. See our Bizagi vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
