We performed a comparison between BizFlow and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"It has an open BPM"
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
BizFlow is ranked 29th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. BizFlow is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BizFlow writes "Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". BizFlow is most compared with , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our BizFlow vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
