We performed a comparison between Camunda and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"The flexibility is great."
"The best feature is the automation."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"Documentation can be improved."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
