We performed a comparison between Camunda and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita and Appian. See our Camunda vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
