We performed a comparison between Camunda and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 28th in Business Process Design. Camunda is rated 8.2, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
