We performed a comparison between Cegid and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"Its user interface is impressive."
"PeopleSoft is easy to understand, where any end user that is logged in can easily navigate through the menus."
"It is a very stable ERP solution. It is also supported on Oracle Cloud and provides extensive features."
"The most valuable feature is IDE."
"Stability-wise, it is a good tool."
"I often say that PeopleSoft's greatest feature is how customizable it is."
"We use a lot of typical cases from PeopleSoft, for example, solutions for security, business performance, monitoring processes, and a lot of training."
"Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"training and performance could be improved."
"The product is not intuitive, and finding the right candidate can be arduous."
"This solution could be improved by lowering the cost of support."
"Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"The learning and development side of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"On the other hand, the more recent push for standardization precludes customized approaches to certain industry requirements."
"One aspect where PeopleSoft could see improvement is in its level of customization."
"Stability is an area where the solution lacks and needs to be improved."
Cegid is ranked 23rd in Talent Management with 12 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 5th in Talent Management with 80 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, Workday, BambooHR and UKG, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and SAP ERP. See our Cegid vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.