We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and Ivanti Neurons for MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Intune enables us to manage our devices from anywhere."
"The stability is good."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I can reach devices or computers over the internet. I don't need to worry about the network connectivity between the offices. I can manage any device. That is the most important part."
"It is a very helpful solution."
"The solution appears to be stable and scalable."
"We use a local Active Directory, but we weren't able to manage all our on-site systems without a solution like Intune, and we needed to deploy software like VPNs and other things. It's seamless now to to this through Intune."
"I have found the location analytics feature that is built into the APs to be the most valuable. It allows you to compare data and to single out individuals who are repeatedly coming into your store. We can observe different trends. This is what separates it from a lot of the other solutions."
"The cloud dashboard's analytics data is particularly valuable, giving me insights into user activities and making it easy to track and manage devices."
"We can reconfigure a client’s setup remotely with minimal effort."
"The UI is easy to learn."
"Meraki Systems Manager's most valuable features are password management, device tracking, remote resetting and wiping, device management, inventory management, and easy policy deployment."
"The best features of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager include its simplicity and ease of use. It is straightforward to set up and manage devices compared to other products."
"It's very easy to just keep adding devices as needed."
"The solution is simple."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The company provides great customer service."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"A new Intune feature allows application packaging, but it incurs additional licensing costs for a significant number of applications."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"I'm still playing around with it and haven't had any issues with the product yet, but support can definitely be improved."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"Regarding mobile devices, Intune is good, but there are other services that I would say are ahead of Intune from an administration and reporting point of view."
"Integration with Mac devices requires some improvement."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a four out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. It is more difficult."
"I've participated in numerous product launches primarily focused on HP and Dell. Consequently, there should be a vested interest in local gatherings to showcase product advantages and performance. Particularly in Singapore, it only has so limited integrators to engage in IP product sales. There's room for improvement through dedicated workshops and training. The European and Western markets differ significantly from the context here. The physical location holds more importance. Thus, they should have a survey to evaluate demand, supply, and sales points, tailoring strategies accordingly."
"Security could be improved, and there could be more features that enable you to customize the end customer solution."
"Cisco's authorized scripting can be complicated. For example, we sometimes enter the wrong code using this script, and then we had to dictate to find the problem."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"Meraki is limiting our connections."
"Because Cisco has improved a lot and is competing with other technologies that are innovative and brand new to the market, the only improvements they have to make are to keep up with the current competition and remain competitive with other solutions."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews while Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 5 reviews. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, Ivanti Avalanche, IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Endpoint Central. See our Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. Ivanti Neurons for MDM report.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
