We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and Ivanti Neurons for MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Autopilot is a great feature. Most users are looking for a zero-touch deployment."
"The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The solution appears to be stable and scalable."
"The Asset Management and Auto Pilot are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature for us is the security, including risk analysis and patch management."
"The most valuable includes managing everything from a single console."
"We have not experienced any bugs or glitches with this solution."
"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are remote control and setting up a phone."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"It can change policies based on geolocation or schedules."
"MaaS can force people to lock their phones. Not everyone likes having a PIN and other security features on their phones, but this sets a requirement that you can't get your emails unless you have a PIN on your phone. That was a good feature, and we were able to easily increase the PIN from four digits to six digits. Overall, it was pretty user-friendly."
"It helped us reduce the number of support incidents by limiting users' access to device configurations."
"Asset management is the most valuable feature and integral for device inventory."
"We introduced the product as part of the SOC-2 requirement. The tool's most valuable features include keeping the operating system updated, tracking software inventory, controlling computer administrators, and the ability to wipe a computer in case of a security threat. It helps us to be compliant, and it is one of the reasons we implemented it."
"The tool's most valuable features are application, distribution, and security. It helps to block user access."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The company provides great customer service."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"The installation could be improved to be simplified."
"There could be more wizard-driven policy development or creation. Some of the policies can get quite complex. If they have a wizard that assists the administrators in creating the policy, that will be a great job."
"The reporting could be improved, as it's pretty poor compared to other products of this type."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"The configuration could be better by consolidating options and making it simpler."
"They should make it easier to order it, however, that's generally true for everything from Microsoft."
"The feature that allows us to import the business application from the configuration manager to Intune is not very good at this time."
"The solution needs to offer live technical support. Right now, it's just a chat window and it's rather unhelpful."
"Configuring policies is difficult in IBM MaaS360. It also needs to improve usability."
"When we have MaaS360 installed on smartphones, it consumes the battery of the device at a much faster pace. This is one of the areas of improvement that I would like to highlight. We have also observed that in the contact list, a lot of duplication is happening. A single contact is duplicated three or four times, which also consumes more memory resources. If they can work on improving it for these aspects, it will have a more positive impact not only on the way the application is being consumed by the user but also on user satisfaction. A lot of new features are being deployed or rolled out by companies that are competitors of IBM MaaS360. IBM will have to ensure that all those features are on board so that we have a complete suite of features in the platform, rather than deploying multiple diverse solutions to cater to the requirements of our customers."
"IBM MaaS360’s threat management feature needs improvement. It could identify even more malicious attacks."
"They should allow for the building of custom reports with graphics."
"Can be added process of export/import environment configuration to simplify any migration processes."
"Its integration with Microsoft Teams could be better."
"We had a problem with Microsoft computers. If you downloaded emails on a Microsoft Windows Surface PC, that would also require a license. The Outlook application didn't look great for us on a PC."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 5 reviews. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, IBM MobileFirst and Sophos Mobile, whereas Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, Ivanti Avalanche, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management. See our IBM MaaS360 vs. Ivanti Neurons for MDM report.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.