We performed a comparison between Citrix Endpoint Management and ManageEngine Endpoint Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management)."As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."
"Configuration profiles, remediation, scripts, and auto-pilot features are very good."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"The biggest benefits of Intune are the ability to push changes and the added security. When we moved forward with Defender, we onboarded all those machines automatically. That helps dramatically. For a while, we were left with machines that weren't protected. We could see where people had done things they shouldn't have done, and Defender saved our skins a few times. It didn't happen a lot, but it happened enough that it made us glad we made that decision."
"I like the group policy management feature, which performs application monitoring and device enrollment."
"The most important thing for me is the autopilot feature."
"I believe that the solution is actually in Gartner's top quadrant at the moment for mobile device management."
"It allows our clients to have the confidence to centrally manage policies for security. It helps them in securing the organization from a technology aspect."
"ShareFile, in particular, is valuable with its ease of sharing, and the best category security that is in the hands of users."
"We have seen improvements in compliance management on the devices."
"One key feature is secure application delivery, which enables the secure delivery of mobile and web applications to end-user devices. This ensures data protection and compliance with corporate policies."
"A valuable feature of Citrix Endpoint Management is that it's stable. The stability is not a challenge among the move to the cloud."
"The MAM applications of the product are great."
"The product is capable of acting in many different ways to help secure architecture."
"Well, what we like is that it catch actually a lot of features constantly upgrading. So all the three maybe there there were some features as the tenant on the earliest version. Now it's it's almost everything that we we need. So managing security ManageEngine configuration. It's we are very satisfied because it has the Telstra that's what we we need."
"The solution's stability is better than the other solutions in the market."
"The patch management aspect of the solution is the most valuable part for us."
"What I like best about this product is that I can log on to every PC, very easily, and chat with the user via the chat feature."
"The stability is very good."
"The mobile functionality is very easy."
"The solution is stable."
"We use the product to know about our assets and manage remote support."
"I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows."
"There are items that require improvements. One is the controls from iOS."
"When somebody has a customized application or their own company's application, we cannot deploy that application."
"Once it's configured it is unobtrusive, but it does take some hands-on to configure and deploy it properly."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"It would be beneficial to have a more straightforward understanding of Intune's capabilities, presented in a simplified manner."
"There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations."
"What would make this product better is adding more security policies and features in the next upgrade."
"Support for inventory management of Apple devices should be added."
"Requires integrating with ABM before enabling some of the features."
"The tool’s battery usage was high."
"Citrix needs to improve the architecture. They also need to strengthen the application integration. They keep referring to some things to be required as security, and they keep selling the next level and on-premise separately. They should give the customer the opportunity to decide whether they want to use the next level on-premise or on-cloud, but they should not charge additional fees if the customer wants to deploy the next level on-premise because the customer is already being charged as the end user. They should allow next level on-premise optimization without any additional charges."
"Citrix often depends on other services like backend data centers, network security, and application firewalls. Issues in these areas can be misinterpreted as Citrix issues by users."
"Its licensing should be improved."
"I would like to see them come out with a SaaS version of the product in the future."
"The solution isn't fully stable, and, when it goes down, it's hard to get it up and running."
"The team I've currently got is not using it particularly well, due to the fact that they don't know how to use it particularly well. They've not done any training and so on."
"Desktop Central has very good information, however, you can't customize the dashboards."
"Computer imaging is powerful but breaks frequently. The reason for this breaking is not clear and requires heavy amounts of attention to keep operational. There is a lot of room for this tool to do more but the reliability of this process should be focused on first to ensure core competencies are being fixed before more features are added."
"The performance sometimes lags a bit because the solution is demanding on system resources."
"It might be helpful if they offered a simpler way to use the OS deployment function. It's a bit complicated for most of the customers."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix Endpoint Management is ranked 7th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 10 reviews while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 3rd in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 59 reviews. Citrix Endpoint Management is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Citrix Endpoint Management writes "Offers flexible application management that allows secure delivery of applications to endpoints, enabling users to operate applications on the go". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". Citrix Endpoint Management is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, MOBI, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), CyberArk Identity and Ivanti Endpoint Manager, whereas ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) vendors.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
