We performed a comparison between CloverDX Designer and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Its simplicity and the way it handles graphs are the most valuable features."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"API management."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"If I could give any advice to the guys who are developing it, I would suggest them to really look at the enterprise features, such as being able to log what's going on, being able to capture the current state of processing, and being able to recover from error situations. So, there should be a focus on logging, recoverability, and monitoring. We should be able to monitor what's going on, and in case of any issues, we should be able to recover and restart processing and other things. For scalability and performance, I would probably suggest the Pushdown feature so that you can do the transformation directly on the data source. You do not need to do that calculation within the ETL server. For this, you should be aware of the type of data because each database or kind of storage, such as Hadoop, has its own ANSI standard or language, such as SQL. Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM have their own language. Based on the feedback that I have got, its initial setup takes some time. It could perhaps be simpler."
"It should give better control over account management."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"The stability could be better."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
Earn 20 points
CloverDX Designer is ranked 68th in Data Integration while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 41 reviews. CloverDX Designer is rated 7.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CloverDX Designer writes "Simple, stable, and allows us to handle data from various sources, but needs enterprise features for logging, recoverability, and monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". CloverDX Designer is most compared with , whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.