We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"Low code development."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable."
"We have used a lot of out-of-the-box reporting on the process performance metrics. We have been able to make suggested changes to staff for this role or streamlining by eliminate some activities where people were not requiring a lot of work in the first place."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of IBM BPM."
"By automating several tasks, we have already reduced a lot of work for the business."
"It is efficient in reducing costs."
"It is easy to take a requirement, put it in the code, and deploy it."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"There are a lot of things that you get out-of-the-box: Timers and so on, which took a lot of effort and code before."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"Performance in the development environment space. I know that they have been taking it off the desktop version and putting on the web, and it is not 100% yet."
"The product is extremely complex to use and administrate."
"Could increase vulnerability and security patches to make it more robust."
"I believe that if the license were cheaper, it would have a greater impact."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"It is not user-friendly."
"IBM BPM's UI is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.