We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Prometheus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product has an easy-to-understand interface."
"The most valuable feature is that we can receive information in different formats."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The best thing about Prometheus is its integration."
"It lets me proactively identify and resolve system issues. This, in terms of, most of the time, really reduces downtime. Because when there are notifications on time when we engage it quickly on time, our downtime is highly reduced. So basically, Prometheus is for monitoring and alerting."
"The solution helps us to scale our products and services, and it helps me by gathering those metrics."
"The scalability of Prometheus is very good."
"The most valuable features of the solution are metrics scraping capabilities and the open source community and support."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"If you are not quite technical, it can be pretty hard to understand the way it works and how to query data in Prometheus."
"Prometheus has a learning curve when setting it up. It definitely requires a little bit more hands-on than other solutions. It is an open source solution which means you do need to go through and read the literature that they have online for setting it up. The setup could be made easier."
"Its stability could be even better."
"Prometheus' UI color can improve. Using the Prometheus UI for configuration or analyzing queries is a horrible experience."
"There is a need for a more comprehensive overview of exporters, especially when dealing with many of them."
"When it comes to deployment, if you have no experience with something like a CI/CD pipeline, it might be a challenge."
"I would like to see improvement in the analysis tools and customization features."
"The simplicity of the query language could be improved. The current query language is not easy to work with."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Prometheus is ranked 9th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 32 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Prometheus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prometheus writes "A very flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas Prometheus is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic, Dynatrace, Sentry and AWS X-Ray. See our Coralogix vs. Prometheus report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
