We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Sophos UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I found that the best feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is reporting. Its reporting feature is excellent, fast, and easy to prep and launch."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"It has been working fine. You just turn it on, and it works."
"The tool is stable."
"There are plenty of features available, such as Full Guard and WAN."
"The solution's web filtering is an important feature for us in our company."
"User and network policies to be managed on a single screen with powerful filtering and search options."
"The dashboard is very good-looking and offers maximum features. If a customer's website has a problem, we can guide them over the phone because they can easily find the specific option on the dashboard. That's why we suggest buying Sophos."
"It makes it a lot easier for us to maintain things. Prior to it, things were more difficult. This means less time on us. We can focus on other things. The recovery is more in man-hours for us than anything else."
"It works well without any maintenance. So far, it has worked pretty well regardless of the traffic."
"Brings greater visibility into the network traffic coming inside and passing away from the company."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security."
"Sophos UTM is very user-friendly and has good integration with other solutions."
"The solution is scalable."
"The solution is easy to handle and configure."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is synchronized security."
"It isn't missing anything."
"I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them."
"Technical support could be faster."
"The solution is at its end of life and some of the appliances are finishing."
"Maybe network traffic analysis for malware and malicious behavior."
"The policy is a bit too vague."
"VPN configuration is not very swift."
"It should have a better VPN client. We decided to find something different than Cyberoam because of the VPN client software. It would be nice to have a user interface not only in English but also in different languages."
"The ease of use could be a bit better."
"The solution needs to do better at covering mobile devices, although they may have an integrated solution for that purpose."
"The reporting could be a lot better."
"The logs are not clear, which means that you need an additional piece of software in order to read them clearly."
"Sophos customer support could use some improvement."
"The initial setup may be difficult for those not familiar with the product."
"During initial configuration, I encountered a few issues."
"We had some problems with the configuration. They had provided a CloudFormation template, and we had to go several rounds to make it work."
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Sophos UTM is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 110 reviews. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "It's a highly stable platform with very few hardware issues". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, Cisco Secure Firewall, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Sophos XG, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Sophos UTM report.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.