We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Sophos UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to maintain."
"Content filtering, as this enables me to control that which employees can view at different time quotas."
"The solution's web filtering is an important feature for us in our company."
"I like the SSL VPN connection. Cyberoam works well for controlling users and authenticating their connection to the internet."
"We are using it as a security shield. It does not allow access before that in case we have restricted a few things from users, so it helps me in that."
"For a small-medium enterprise this solution is easy to manage and operate."
"The main features I have found best are the load balancer and ease of use."
"The best feature is the flexibility the product offers, in terms of remote access. What we had before was a decentralized mechanism in our organization, but after having this product we were able to get the remote locations into the same LAN. We were able to control the bandwidth and were able to take virtual access of those machines and give them the support, as and when required."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security."
"It improved bandwidth utilization and provided link load balancing features for internet and intranet lease lines."
"The solution can scale."
"It has allowed us to design a bespoke cloud space for our clients, while still having an excellent level of protection."
"The most valuable feature is the price. I've been requesting prices all over these years between different solutions like Fortinet, Palo Alto, and Check Point and Sophos has been the cheapest and the best of all of them that I have tried. I have been working with Fortinet, it's a fact that the price is surprisingly better."
"The most valuable feature is that it is easy to administer."
"It is a very good product. The threat monitoring process is the most valuable feature."
"We've found the technical support to be helpful."
"Cyberoam UTM needs to have more certifications with third-parties, such as NSS Labs."
"Hence, it needs to be easier to configure rules using the solution."
"Maybe network traffic analysis for malware and malicious behavior."
"While the security features are excellent, they could be improved."
"The product’s pricing has increased by approximately 45% in four months. This particular area needs improvement."
"The reporting part could be more user-friendly for troubleshooting and identifying network issues. It should be more easy for a normal user to identify the problem in their network."
"The reporting should be improved as well as the backup."
"The solution is at its end of life and some of the appliances are finishing."
"The classification segregation of applications lacks sufficient definition."
"The technical support team’s response time could be improved."
"Last year, Sophos had some major internal management changes that negatively impacted their support."
"The only time we face a problem or issues is when we place a ticket. We have found that response is very slow."
"I would like them to move from the Classic Load Balancer to the Network Load Balancer. This would make it easier to do certain things with Amazon. They are able to do some enhancements with Network Load Balancer that they are unable to do with Classic Load Balancer."
"We need a better VPN client for the customers."
"The logs are not clear, which means that you need an additional piece of software in order to read them clearly."
"Sophos should improve its ability to check something like bandwidth consumption for users or something more real-time."
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Sophos UTM is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 110 reviews. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "It's a highly stable platform with very few hardware issues". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and SonicWall NSa, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Sophos UTM report.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.