We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Sophos UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the IPSec forwarding."
"The solution is excellent for web and application filtering and remote access with the VPN."
"The firewall feature has different branches, such as extended firewalls."
"The product is worth the investment."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The solution has good load balancers."
"The product, itself, doesn't seem to have any bugs or glitches."
"The solution's web filtering is an important feature for us in our company."
"I would recommend UTM over XG because it's easier to manage."
"It is easy to manage."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security."
"With over 150 firewalls in our portal, management and monitoring have never been easier."
"If a computer does get infected the Sophos appliance lets us know via it's Advanced Threat Protection so we can get a much faster response time."
"It is a very good product. The threat monitoring process is the most valuable feature."
"We've found the technical support to be helpful."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Cyberoam UTM needs to have more certifications with third-parties, such as NSS Labs."
"The reporting should be improved as well as the backup."
"The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features."
"It isn't missing anything."
"The product’s pricing has increased by approximately 45% in four months. This particular area needs improvement."
"The solution is at its end of life and some of the appliances are finishing."
"The policy is a bit too vague."
"The product fails to provide proper reports, making it an area where improvements are required."
"There is still room for improvement in wireless protection. I don't mean their WiFi device is bad, but there are still things to improve on, such as WiFi roaming."
"The application control is really bad. It needs a lot of enhancements. The traffic shaping and bandwidth control, and application control need a lot of work."
"We would like to have unique viewable IDs for rules and in the packet filter logfile, for easier debugging of old log files."
"VPN needs IKEv2, but it’s in the roadmap. Also, all new, cool features will only come to the new Sophos XG Firewall."
"The only time we face a problem or issues is when we place a ticket. We have found that response is very slow."
"The interface configuration could be improved."
"Sophos should improve its ability to check something like bandwidth consumption for users or something more real-time."
"I think that additional metrics features are needed to be able to monitor other areas or to monitor as much as you can, at a fine-grain resolution."
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Sophos UTM is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 110 reviews. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "It's a highly stable platform with very few hardware issues". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, Cisco Secure Firewall, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Sophos XG, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Sophos UTM report.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.