We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"It's fast, predicts well, and is basically the best tool in the market for the automotive industry and network planning projects."
"It's not too hard to handle the initial setup."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"The best feature of this solution, is that it provides businesses with a way to see information from across different process streams, in one place via dashboards."
"The best thing about Infor LN is that you can use it for inter-company business and for international businesses, especially by mid-sized and big companies."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"It’s a stable product."
"The user interface is not very intuitive for newer users."
"When you have a bug in the system, you get some kind of alert. They should explain those alerts more."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"From a technical perspective, LN needs to work on customization and integration. It's fairly expensive for many clients to migrate from a customized private solution to the cloud. Infor needs to improve the cloud solution to make the migration from the on-prem customized solution faster and smoother. Otherwise, many clients will find it difficult or expensive to do."
"The finance model within this solution does not have very strong reporting functionality, which I would like to see improved."
"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor M3. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.