We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"The solution is stable."
"Responsive Portal + Process Federation Server. This set of solutions offers a unified worklist to our customers."
"One of the reasons for adopting this solution ten years ago was its ease of use. It had a lot of off-the-shelf functionality, and it did not need to be developed specifically for the project that we were implementing. That was the main reason for adopting it in the beginning."
"With the tester coach wherein you can interact with the interface while you're designing the process."
"Enabled us to convert most of the paper-based work into an automated workflow process, and some of them were converted into straight-through processing, with no human interaction involved whatsoever."
"Setting it up is fairly easy. If somebody has knowledge of the system, he or she will be able to do it fairly quickly."
"It has reduced a lot of manual errors and processes."
"It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"I'd like the tool to be more flexible."
"The integration could be improved."
"The initial setup was complex."
"Performance on large scale requirements could also be improved."
"We still have a couple of issues that we are working on right now with stability. Mostly on the configuration side of the tool, and it has been about a month that we have been working to stabilize the platform."
"IBM BPM uses JavaScript as a programming language for the server-side. I don’t know why it’s not Java, as it’s more powerful and the JavaScript part is translated into Java anyway."
"Performance in the development environment space. I know that they have been taking it off the desktop version and putting on the web, and it is not 100% yet."
"Could increase vulnerability and security patches to make it more robust."
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.