We performed a comparison between FlutterFlow and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Low-Code Development Platforms."FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."
"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."
"The cloud aspect has been great. We don't have to do a lot of research in order to begin integrations. It's so easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Model-driven or Canvas application-making platforms. The power of the two gives us exactly what we are looking for."
"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."
"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."
"I have found the technical support to be helpful."
"Of all of the solutions I evaluated, it was the easiest to use and deploy."
"It uses a lot of AI, which is helpful, especially during the setup process."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."
"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."
"The solution is evolving very fast and every month new features are introduced. Sometimes it's difficult to catch up with all the evolution that's happening. I had to focus on Power BI for a while and left PowerApps at the side for a couple of months and when I came back, it had changed its interface and moved components around."
"I would like to have more options for changing the layout because customizing something as simple as colors is very hard."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"The connectors are the main components that reference the data sources, and these need to be improved."
"The price could be lower."
"Microsoft PowerApps is not responsive in nature."
"There are occasional performance challenges."
"The fact that we couldn't share that with our other organization or outside of the organization, consisting of our colleagues in the joint ventures, was a weakness of the solution."
FlutterFlow is ranked 17th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 77 reviews. FlutterFlow is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of FlutterFlow writes "Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". FlutterFlow is most compared with Mendix, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Unqork.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.