We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"We like that it does not require a lot of hours to train our people."
"This tool is very useful when it comes to enterprise-grade automation and governmental processes for the security aspects, performance, and reliability."
"Its workflow and integration with SAP are the most valuable features. It is also a stable solution."
"The solution has helped us automate business processes."
"Its most valuable features are usability and integration with other IBM products."
"Everything is coupled together and comes as one solution."
"This is one of the best tools to support the business and the way we work, and the numerous processes we need to implement."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities - BPM can connect with almost any legacy or advanced system."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"It needs more customization. We like to customize the screens to show more things related to our company."
"It is a really powerful tool, but its entry price is so high, which makes it a very exclusive club for who gets to use it. The thing that seemed to be the most intolerable was that you could put lots and lots of users on it, and it worked fine, but if you put lots and lots of developers on it, it sure seemed to have challenges. The biggest challenge was the development because of the Eclipse tool. It just seemed like irrespective of the development team that you put together, whether it had 10 or 50 people, you would end up having to reboot the development server throughout the day when you concurrently had lots of people hammering on the system. The development server just got sluggish. This was true for every project I was on. Once you got more than about five people working on the system at the same time, it would just get slower and slower during development work, and the only way to fix it was to reboot the server. It became just like a routine. Sometimes, we would reboot at lunch or dinner time, which is silly. After the cloud instances started rolling out, I never saw that again. That was probably the one big advantage of the cloud version. Instead of using an independent Eclipse-based process development tool, we moved to web-based process and design. The web-based tool definitely had greater performance than the Eclipse-based tool. I never got onto another project after that with 50 people, so I don't know how the performance is when you get a large team on it, but it definitely seems that the cloud design tool was a massive improvement."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"The price and the overall installation process could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the stability."
"Importing and exporting between multiple environments is more difficult with other tools."
"From the testing perspective and minor enhancements perspective, customization is something that is a little tedious as compared to new tools. In addition, various open-source tools that are available are not working with IBM BPM."
"I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions."
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 39th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, Tungsten TotalAgility and Hubble, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.