We performed a comparison between Git and IBM Rational ClearCase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"Git is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"We use the tool to store codes."
"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."
"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."
"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."
"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal."
"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."
"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."
"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."
"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."
"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."
"I would like more documentation."
"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
"The price could be improved."
"I would like to see less updates with the product."
"The protection needs to be improved."
"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."
"The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."
Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews while IBM Rational ClearCase is ranked 8th in Version Control with 6 reviews. Git is rated 8.6, while IBM Rational ClearCase is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearCase writes "Useful for version control but UI is slow ". Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, Surround SCM, Helix Core and Liquibase, whereas IBM Rational ClearCase is most compared with GitHub, Bitbucket, IBM Rational ClearQuest, Helix Core and Apache Subversion. See our Git vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
