We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"The product is easy to use."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."
"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."
"I would like to see less updates with the product."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."
"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."
"It's not very user-friendly."
"The solution works perfectly fine so far."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Bitbucket, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Git is most compared with Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM, Helix Core and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.