We performed a comparison between HCL Notes and IceWarp based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the UI."
"It is one of the best products in the world for workflow applications. It works very well for workflows or decisional processes where a task needs to be first approved by someone. After that, the task moves to the next or final stage where another person approves it with some notes or attached documents."
"The solution is practical, good interface, and performs well."
"The product is very stable and scalable."
"Its security is absolutely stratospheric. In an application, you can lock down to field-level security. For example, I could log in and see a field in an HR database with salaries. When you log in, you see exactly the same database, but the field with the salary just isn't there. So, you can literally have field-level security on it, and you can also have secure encryption. For example, I could give you that database allowing you to see the salary, but a calculation that shows how much they get per month in another field is encrypted. So, you won't be able to see that because you don't have the encryption key. You can implement high-level security very simply."
"The security and performance of the solution are good even though our platform is variable, except for the mail services."
"It is easy to integrate the product with other services."
"The most valuable feature is the access that it provides to documents. This offers us an easy way to make changes."
"The solution's voice services work well for our company."
"The most valuable feature of IceWarp is the chat rooms and file-sharing, they are useful. It is convenient that everything is in one place. You can easily share and collaborate documents, making the program's unity a significant advantage."
"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."
"It's scalable and stable."
"The groupware module is the most valuable feature."
"The product is used very extensively in my company since we have around 1,500 users using it. Also, there is no requirement for any administrators to manage the product by the people who own the solution."
"IceWarp has multiple applications that are easy to use for many people."
"An effective, functional, very good tool for controlling resources."
"We had trouble connecting this solution to the database from Microsoft. We have done it, although it can be easier."
"The only improvement that we're planning to do is that all our applications are still designed in the layout and format of Notes version 4, and our plan over the coming years is to modernize their look. One of the things they're developing or considering deploying is a program to automatically upgrade the look and feel of databases. If they deploy that, that will be revolutionary. In other words, we decide on a corporate look and feel for our database and press a button. We've probably got 50 different applications in Notes, and it would just go through the whole lot and upgrade all of them to look the same."
"I love this product. I have used it for many years, and I have been a developer for it. If anything, it can be faster in the client version. The client version is a little bit hard. It is not fast. This is the only problem I see. Otherwise, it is a very good product."
"I would like to see integration with other solutions."
"The solution could improve by adding some more features."
"Notes needs a major upgrade for the UI."
"GUI and replication can be improved."
"It is a heavy program and uses more resources than an email client should."
"With multiple databases for VOIP, chat and web IMAP, maintenance is cumbersome."
"The exchange compatibility mode is rather limited. Their technical support can also be better. They only provide online support, and there should be some option for escalating."
"Support should be improved. Most of the time, the queries are not resolved within the SLA."
"Although the documentation is extensive and in depth, you must familiarize yourself with it before taking full advantage of the product."
"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."
"Although it is not a tool, video conferencing should be scalable and operate in a professional and efficient way."
"The tool's configuration capabilities are not straightforward. Apart from that, if I want to archive emails into a vault so that they can be retrieved again later, the integration doesn't work, and IceWarp crashes."
"The solution should improve the mailing list feature. Google has a similar feature where you can automate sending files to different people in a sequence, but that feature is no longer available in the current version of IceWarp. Other features may also have been removed in the current version."
HCL Notes is ranked 7th in Email Applications with 12 reviews while IceWarp is ranked 6th in Email Applications with 15 reviews. HCL Notes is rated 8.0, while IceWarp is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HCL Notes writes "Accessible from any device, good support, and works very well for emails, document sharing, and workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IceWarp writes "A tool that is scalable and can accommodate a large number of users but needs to improve the support it provides to its users ". HCL Notes is most compared with HCL Verse, Microsoft Exchange, HCL Domino, Google Workspace and OpenText GroupWise, whereas IceWarp is most compared with Google Workspace, Zimbra Collaboration, Microsoft Exchange, Zoho Mail and Barracuda Email Security Gateway. See our HCL Notes vs. IceWarp report.
See our list of best Email Applications vendors.
We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.