We performed a comparison between IBM App Connect and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."App Connect's best feature is that it can be deployed in a container."
"There is a friendly interface for configuration, and integration is made easy."
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendliness of the application."
"Technical support is good."
"We use IBM App Connect for the integration between the applications."
"It has an efficient design flow."
"It can handle API conversions with mapping and transformation rules, simplifying the development process."
"It's a powerful application for collaboration. It has many features for customization and integration."
"The installation process is easy."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"IBM needs to enhance and have a stronger offering for the event streaming part because this is the future needed for the containerization and the new integration requirement."
"IBM App Connect should improve security features."
"The installation of containers could be simplified, as it currently requires a senior-level installer."
"The setup time for App Connect could be improved."
"Updates are constantly delayed."
"The product should improve its support."
"In the next release, I would like to get some quality connectors."
"The interface could be better."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."
"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
IBM App Connect is ranked 11th in Cloud Data Integration with 21 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. IBM App Connect is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM App Connect writes "Offers flexible adapters, good scalability but logging can be difficult at times". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". IBM App Connect is most compared with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server and IBM InfoSphere DataStage, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Talend Open Studio. See our IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
