We performed a comparison between IBM App Connect and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides good security features."
"It has an efficient design flow."
"There is a friendly interface for configuration, and integration is made easy."
"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."
"It's a powerful application for collaboration. It has many features for customization and integration."
"When using IBM stacks, IBM App Connect is suitable and integrates well with other IBM products like WebSphere."
"It's stable to use, connect with the cloud, and to deploy."
"The solution is fast and supports Open UI 3.0 certification."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"API management."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The setup time for App Connect could be improved."
"The interface could be better."
"The user interface of IBM App Connect can be a little bit more user-friendly, I would say because the first-time developer is onboarded while using IBM App Connect, he or she may get a little intimidated or daunted looking at all the options available or the pipelines, et cetera."
"Plugins for the repositories are difficult to find."
"They reply in one or two hours at most, but they could be better."
"IBM App Connect should improve security features."
"IBM App Connect is scalable. From the administration side, they need to improve the RBAC model, as well as the clustering of this product. It will be good if we can start up the cluster, via IBM Connect Console. Some other products like MuleSoft, are providing this type of administration. MuleSoft is easy to use and user friendly."
"The addition of string functionality would be a benefit, particularly in the ESQL space that IBM already uses internally."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
IBM App Connect is ranked 11th in Cloud Data Integration with 21 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews. IBM App Connect is rated 8.2, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM App Connect writes "Offers flexible adapters, good scalability but logging can be difficult at times". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". IBM App Connect is most compared with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, webMethods Integration Server, TIBCO BusinessWorks, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Infor ION. See our IBM App Connect vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.