We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Agility is the key. It gives our customers a faster way to be able to implement processes, get ownership of task, visibility into a process. The ability to modify that process, optimize that process over time, is probably the biggest benefit that they get from the software."
"Our customers use the solution as a workflow platform to manage their processes."
"The solution offers great notifications."
"It helps improve your process through continual measurement."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"It is a stale solution."
"This product does the job in terms of executing the workflow."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of IBM BPM."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"Performance in the development environment space. I know that they have been taking it off the desktop version and putting on the web, and it is not 100% yet."
"The product is extremely complex to use and administrate."
"IBM BPM needs to have a better and modified interface."
"Our developers are complaining that it's too complex to maintain."
"They could provide case studies to investigate and understand the functionality of business processes before development."
"I hope IBM uses something from IBM Content Navigator to make the interface easier to navigate."
"All our clients are changing to microservice and cloud service. However, BPM does not have a solution for microservice and cloud service."
"The setup was quite complex because the solution was cutting-edge at that time and IBM invested considerably in the implementation, likely at a loss to themselves."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our IBM BPM vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.