We performed a comparison between Infor ION and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We haven't had any issues with ION so far."
"ION is good for building custom middleware boxes."
"The tool's most valuable feature is middleware capabilities."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the ability to monitor integration performance and the reasons for the failure of inbound and outbound transactions. We can see both inbound and outbound transactions, and it gives us a mirror image or the whole history of all inbound and outbound transactions between Infor M3 Business Engine and the third parties."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"I would like to see ION add automated setup and integration with Salesforce. They need to work on these types of tools."
"The dashboard is not very simple and can be a bit tricky."
"ION's integration with older applications could be better."
"Infor ION doesn't provide connectors for all integration touchpoints. Sometimes, we may have to build our own. It incurs additional costs for the customer."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The price could be improved."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
Infor ION is ranked 8th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 40 reviews. Infor ION is rated 8.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor ION writes "It's bundled, so I don't need to purchase an additional product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Infor ION is most compared with SAP Process Orchestration and BizTalk Server, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Denodo. See our Infor ION vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.