We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"Scalability and load balancing."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
Earn 20 points
JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. JBoss ESB is rated 7.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". JBoss ESB is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
