We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another."
"Scalability and load balancing."
"The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."
"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The installation process is easy."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."
"The stability could be improved."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"There are some issues with both stability and scalability."
"From an improvement perspective, there should be fewer coding challenges for users in Mule ESB."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"The integration capabilities need to be improved."
"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite and webMethods Integration Server, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server and TIBCO BusinessWorks. See our Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
