We performed a comparison between Jira and LiquidPlanner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."One of the valuable features is traceability from requirements to test cases."
"The solution is very scalable and flexible."
"Has a good dashboard with good tracking features."
"It is very straightforward and easy to use."
"I liked the flexibility of the application. It was pretty user-friendly."
"A stable solution with no unplanned downtime."
"The most valuable features of this solution are workflow and reporting."
"You can record your unit testing, regression testing, UATs, et cetera."
"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."
"One thing that I don't like about Jira is that when you do an export, it only allows a thousand issues. So the export feature needs to be better."
"The thing I don't like is that it is hard to decide which dropdown options should be selected. When we try and submit it, it will state that there are certain mandates in place. It won't allow us to submit the form unless we fill out all the details."
"I have to go through a lot of processes to consider it done. I have to log in then change the logins and make it interesting. It's not so good for testing."
"The work items structure is not hierarchical and that needs to be changed. It's too flat."
"Lacks some common building block approaches to certain things."
"In JIRA, it's a bit complex in terms of what advanced search queries we use. Sharing them is also a problem. Because TFS is on the cloud, we can easily save that query and share it with our team members."
"The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat."
"In Jira, sometimes developers are not getting alerts when Jira is moving out of the SLA to the product development team."
"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."
Earn 20 points
Jira is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 263 reviews while LiquidPlanner is ranked 36th in Project Management Software. Jira is rated 8.2, while LiquidPlanner is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LiquidPlanner writes "Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas LiquidPlanner is most compared with .
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.