We performed a comparison between Jira and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The features that we find most valuable are the Workflow, Scrum workflow, and Dashboards."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that it is a quite powerful user tracking system."
"This is a user friendly solution."
"The dynamic communication and the ability to customize it the way we want are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs."
"The most valuable features of Jira are the dashboards and user interface. The processes within Jira to monitor, maintain and release are beneficial. It is a continuous development solution."
"You no longer need to email people. You can mention them right in Jira and have conversations there."
"We have the best community to support any problems that we have."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"There needs to be more integration and connectivity."
"Could be more intuitive."
"Jira lacks easy capacity calculation compared to TFS, making it harder to know how much work to allocate to each specialist."
"The solution's stability could be improved, and it could be made more robust."
"Jira could provide more insight into sprints such as how did we perform in the last sprint compared to other sprints. It would be helpful to have metrics and a dashboard feature for others to see."
"The following definitely need improvement: UI, speed, and mobile app functionality."
"Integration with some of the automation tools could be improved."
"I would like to see more integration available with more tools."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 259 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.