We performed a comparison between Jira and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation."
"It's a very complete product overall."
"You can record your unit testing, regression testing, UATs, et cetera."
"It has an easy UI that can easily plug-in to every level."
"It is user-friendly, and you can manage your project according to the methodology you want. It is also easy to configure."
"The most valuable feature of Jira is the reporting feature, which allows us to track our team's tasks."
"The integration of other open source tools with Jira is very useful. It allows us to create documents and transcriptions, making it versatile beyond software development."
"Its visual display and ease of use are most valuable."
"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."
"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."
"Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed)."
"I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures."
"The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency."
"I am impressed with the product's automation which makes everything easy."
"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."
"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."
"There's a really steep learning curve for configuration."
"It should have Behavior Driven Development (BDD). There should be an option to add macros to help with that. A lot of people are using it now, and it would be nice if there was a way in there to be able to generate the BDD of commands whenever you're creating a story."
"If CI/CD is integrated with it, it would be better. I've used Azure DevOps before, and it's nice to have everything, such as CI/CD Repos and other things, integrated. Jira has fewer integrations. Azure DevOps has an easier interface, and it has got everything in one spot. I don't have to jump around in different applications."
"The solution needs more integrations with Azure DevOps OnPrem."
"A more organized hierarchy is important. Reporting and JQL create issues for me. They do not completely cover the reporting part that I need to report in terms of my capacity to plan. In the same token, there is no record at this very moment to provide me with one export with epics story points, tasks, or issues and their sub-tasks at the same time."
"I have noticed a problem with Jira in the Philippines. In the Philippines, there are only a few companies that offer local support, which is alarming."
"Jira could be more, for example, like Micro Focus, which is what I mostly work with currently."
"I do know the initial setup was pretty complicated. The user interface could be better organized and easier. "
"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."
"I would like the product to add more working processes."
"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."
"This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve."
"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."
"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."
"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."
"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 263 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 16th in Rapid Application Development Software with 73 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Sales Creatio, Oracle Fusion Service, OutSystems and Jitterbit Vinyl.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
