We performed a comparison between Jira and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The configurable workflows and boards make it easy for us to execute and oversee our own unique process."
"I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It helps us automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain."
"The agile framework works well, and I pretty much live by that. Everything, such as sprint management, is laid out."
"Its visual display and ease of use are most valuable."
"There are a lot of different plugins for Jira. Unfortunately, we did not test so many and the big pain point for us is the rigorous handling and the roadmap of Jira. We have a portfolio and structure plugin and we have our story map plugin in Jira"
"We have the best community to support any problems that we have."
"JQL, JIRA Query Language enables me to filter all the issues, display the items as I want."
"The burndown chart is also helpful when it comes to reporting and allows us to know where we are going, especially during development."
"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports."
"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy."
"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."
"We would like to see integration between Tempo and Jira."
"The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat."
"I would prefer it if the solution was more intuitive."
"The solution could improve by having its own tool for quality lifecycle management."
"Although it covers the overall requirements and measurements, it'll help if they had their own test execution feature."
"Could be more intuitive."
"I would like our clients' IT group to be able to have oversight without setting up agents. We're managing tickets, and I'd like their IT group to see everything we're doing without having to set them up as agents. There should be a better way of managing their users. I've got such requests, but Jira is expensive, and it is difficult to pay an agent fee for somebody else to view these tickets. Currently, the only way in which I can do that is by setting a user up as an agent, and it becomes cost-prohibitive. They need to do a better job on ticket viewers."
"The reporting capabilities, specifically customized reports, should be improved. The out-of-box reports don't meet our needs. We are big into customizing our reports, and being able to do ad hoc reporting would be good."
"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."
"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."
"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."
Jira is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 265 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, monday.com and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our Jira vs. Teamwork report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.