We performed a comparison between Kong Gateway Enterprise and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's scalability is good...The solution's technical support is good."
"The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other companies and must ensure they adhere to their allocated usage limits. Without rate limiting, there's a risk of excessive usage, which could result in significant costs."
"This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution."
"Kong enterprise has significantly enhanced our ability to manage and secure our Microservices. Its most valuable feature is monitoring."
"The route limiting feature is very valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise is its capability to integrate with various security tools."
"Good at intercepting traffic and modeling APIs around that."
"It boasts remarkable speed and stability, and these qualities, particularly the gateway's resilience, are standout features for me."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The solution is scalable."
"Kong Enterprise can improve the customization to be able to do the integration properly."
"It becomes difficult if you try to scale it up to multiple clusters."
"We are facing issues with the solution's features like reports and traffic analysis."
"They could focus more on pricing."
"Understanding the configurations and knowing what needs to be done can be a bit difficult initially."
"The technical support team's response time needs to be improved."
"Because it is open-source, it should be less expensive than others."
"The developer portal needs to be improved."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
Kong Gateway Enterprise is ranked 6th in API Management with 20 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Kong Gateway Enterprise is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Kong Gateway Enterprise writes "Provides role-based access control and can be easily customized with Lua script". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Kong Gateway Enterprise is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, WSO2 API Manager, Apigee, Apache APISIX and Layer7 API Management, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and webMethods CloudStreams. See our Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
