We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."
"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The documentation is limited."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 19 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 9.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Perfecto, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail. See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
