"Along with its active directory infrastructure, this solution also possesses the ability to recover and exchange, making it a valuable backup tool."
"It's a good product that's pretty easy to use."
"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."
"I like that Micro Focus keeps a separate catalog of our data."
"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."
"I have used Micro Focus Data Protector for the file backup facilities. My primary use of the software is to backup file data."
"Performs the backup properly and protects our data."
"The solution allows us to be able to backup and exchange directly, to backup Microsoft exchange."
"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."
"The solution has few features as it does not focus on managing anything in the application."
"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."
"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."
"Other tools seem to be easier to use."
"Virtualization."
"I do not think that this solution is relevant in the current IT market. They have not upgraded their features and functionalities which makes it difficult for them to remain competitive."
"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."
"It has a lot of undeveloped functions like window searching and patent searching, and within the main backup processes like VMware and Microsoft Exchange. It's completely not user-friendly, and it has no built-in antivirus software. In my opinion, Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution."
"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."
More ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is ranked 5th in Active Directory Recovery with 1 review while OpenText Data Protector is ranked 24th in Backup and Recovery with 99 reviews. ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is rated 0.0, while OpenText Data Protector is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus writes "Though this tool lacks the features to allow backups on the same server, it is very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Data Protector writes "User-friendly, competitive, agent-based, and easy to manage". ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Semperis Active Directory Forest Recovery (ADFR), Quest Recovery Manager for Active Directory Disaster Recovery Edition and Rubrik, whereas OpenText Data Protector is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Veritas NetBackup, HPE StoreOnce and Symantec Data Loss Prevention.
We monitor all Active Directory Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
