"Along with its active directory infrastructure, this solution also possesses the ability to recover and exchange, making it a valuable backup tool."
"Rubrik is cheap, and you get good performance."
"Rubrik is a faster unit from a hardware perspective. Things, like Live Mount, mean we can bring services back straightaway, then have them transition back into the live storage in the background. Because we can use Live Mount to do instant restores, a restore is now a five-minute job. Then, the rest of it is done in the background, rather than doing something for an hour before you actually get the restore back."
"Cut backup remediation to nearly nothing."
"It has the ability to test DR in a controlled, inexpensive way and to restore between environments."
"The live mounting and compatibility of different operating systems is great."
"The live mount reduces complexity."
"Rubrik has brought all of our backups under a single pane of glass and made recovery extremely simple."
"Live Mount is where we do the majority of our big recoveries, unless it is a file recovery. A file recovery takes a few minutes to restore to where the file in the event a file was accidentally deleted by a user, etc. There has been at least a 90 percent reduction in recovery time based on our previous solution, from the need to recover something to when it's actually recovered went from hours to minutes."
"The solution has few features as it does not focus on managing anything in the application."
"It would be nice if they could work on the pricing a bit."
"There is always room for improvement with some shortcuts for the web interface. They could make it even more beautiful."
"The recovery of Oracle databases is too complicated. It is not something that helps the DBA, the Database Administrator, but it should be done by the backup person like many other solutions. Everything is ready for the DBA to recover the database. It is a way of doing things, but I don't think you should give the backup people the ability to do it."
"Capacity reports could definitely be improved. It's hard to determine what is using the space and why. For instance, you can see that some host is using 2 TB on the Rubrik node and the disk space on that host is 400 GBs. It's hard to explain how there can be 2 TBs of data on local storage when nothing has changed on the host for the past three days."
"It does not offer image-level backups for Hyper-V 2012."
"Better integration for complex NAS structures having to mount at root adds time and workload to the process of NDMP."
"It is an expensive product."
"I would like to see Rubrik better integrate with Microsoft Active Directory. Instead of just backing up a full domain controller, I would like the solution to have Active Directory object knowledge so we can restore specific objects in Active Directory versus restoring the whole domain controller."
More ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is ranked 5th in Active Directory Recovery with 1 review while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 83 reviews. ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is rated 0.0, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus writes "Though this tool lacks the features to allow backups on the same server, it is very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Semperis Active Directory Forest Recovery (ADFR) and Quest Recovery Manager for Active Directory Disaster Recovery Edition , whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain).
We monitor all Active Directory Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
