We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The most valuable feature that we use is the Knowledge Modules."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It can integrate with more recent databases like Cassandra, Hadoop, and other more recent Big Data databases."
"In our DW/BI solution, ODI is the main tool to integrate the data in a daily batch way."
"The tool improved our data integration workflow primarily due to its compatibility with Oracle. Its integration makes it very convenient for analytics. Its most valuable feature is robust extended capability. The solution's debugging capabilities are good."
"I do not have to maintain a separate ETL instance. I can change the SQL when something is not performing correctly."
"Integration with all systems is easy with Oracle Data Integrator, and it is easy to use. I have not used any other product, but with Oracle Data Integrator, we can easily connect to an ERP system, an SAP system, or a cloud application."
"The most valuable feature is Data movement."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"The stability could be better."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"If there was an add-on tool to hide the performance issues and solve them for me, then I might be interested in that as it would provide me value."
"At present, when multiple steps are executed in parallel in the load plan and errors occur, the error handling mechanism does not function correctly."
"It needs easier security."
"There are certain things where it can be improved. Initial solution setup seems a bit complex at the start, it should be improved because it becomes bit tough for a novice to get started on this. Sometimes error description is not helpful to understand the problem it gives some generic type of errors which are at times not that helpful to understand the underlying root cause of the issue."
"The interface of ODI could be improved. For example, navigating and finding functions can be difficult. For example, you have to know which step you need to go to look at where your job status is. The logical step is a bit complex compared to other tools. It's much easier to get a graphical view, but with ODI, it's graphical, plus you have to know all the other pieces that fit around it. You have to think about the logical and physical aspects."
"ODI could improve by focusing on streamlining its features without unnecessary overhead."
"I rate it a seven out of 10 because there is room for growth because ODI is still new, in comparison to Informatica, which is a mature product."
"The performance of the user interface is in need of improvement."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory and Alteryx Designer. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
