We performed a comparison between N-able EDR and SentinelOne Singularity Complete based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"The visibility component is the most valuable feature."
"I appreciate the network control as well as the device control."
"I find the application inventory feature to be extremely useful."
"The best feature of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is that you don't need to configure a lot with it because it provides an unmatched layer of protection out of the box."
"The EDR functionality of the platform is what we use the most. That was the primary reason why we got SentinelOne. That is what we use the most in terms of functionality."
"The tool saves 50% of the staff's time."
"The threat detection and prevention capabilities are valuable, providing development programming support that enables us to perform fair investigations."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the rapid threat detection."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The support needs improvement."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
"This solution would be more attractive to customers if the price were lower."
"The SentinelOne portal is not user-friendly, which is one of its drawbacks."
"The update process can be better. It is very easy to deploy, but over a long period, the updating process can be a little messy. In some EDR solutions, you end up with a very good mechanism to push new versions. It could do with a little work in that area. It is not particularly difficult, but it could do with a little work."
"Their CASB tool needs to mature. I think there are some CASB vendors out there that have a dashboard tool that's much more mature than SentinelOne. That would be the only constructive criticism that I have."
"It is an expensive product."
"The ease of use can be better in Deep Visibility. It is not always the easiest. If I have not been in there in the Deep Visibility module for a long time, I do not always find it that easy to use. I tend to go and have to consult the help quite often if I have not been in there a long time."
"Deployment strategy for large organizations that do not use active directory (AD)."
"As a cloud-based product, there is a minimum number of licenses that need to be purchased, which is unfortunate."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
N-able EDR is ranked 56th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 177 reviews. N-able EDR is rated 0.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of N-able EDR writes "Stable, effective rollback feature, and useful AI models". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". N-able EDR is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Check Point Harmony Endpoint, Elastic Security, Cisco Secure Endpoint and ESET Inspect, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect and Wazuh.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.