We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We find the solution to be stable."
"The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The product is easy to use."
"It's easy to use and straightforward."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
"I am able to authenticate my users on cloud and SaaS applications such as Workday through Okta workflows."
"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."
"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."
"Good support for single sign-on protocols."
"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."
"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."
"The only aspect in which it can be improved is that the interface could be cleaner. I found this even when I was trying to do my certification exam because the certification is hands-on. You find yourself fumbling around a little bit to find simple things. This happens even when you start to get familiar with the product."
"It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."
"Okta Workforce Identity can improve by having more features in governance."
"RESTful Web Service calls and their response seem a bit slow."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."
"Security could be improved."
"The product’s technical support services could be better."
"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 11th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "It is very easy to scale and use as you want, but there could be more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Oracle Access Manager, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0, AWS IAM Identity Center, PingFederate and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.