OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) and OpenText Service Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in IT Service Management (ITSM).
To learn more, read our detailed IT Service Management (ITSM) Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX) are that it is user-friendly, easy to configure, and adaptable.""It offers a range of tools for sales and configuration. It's like a business process improvement platform, suitable for various lines of business operations.""This is a cordless application that can be used throughout any organization.""The tool is very easy to use."

More OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) Pros →

"The initial setup is easy.""The solution will streamline productivity and also improve automation. That would bring efficiency as well the ability to handle a big number of enterprise-wide service needs. Productivity and collaborative capabilities are some of the key benefits.""Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013.""It's easy to scale.""It's pretty well-structured in modules.""The design has been revamped in terms of GUI. The current interface is quite easy to read.""It can adapt to any process in the organization.""It gives us better understanding and control of service management."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"The solution lacks sufficient documentation.""The contract management feature can be improved.""The initial setup of Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX) is complicated, but once it is set up the configuration is straightforward to adapt to the users' or customers' needs.""The product's connectivity with third-party products is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) Cons →

"I don't see anything lacking.""Pure cloud-based native functionality is lacking.""It needs good integration with the configuration database, that's lacking at the moment, It's not that good.""The solution does not interface well with other products and is difficult to implement.""It, still, has a bit of more of improvement possibilities in the codeless part. But, I can see that they are working on it, so that's quite good as well.""Micro Focus Service Manager is not very great. It would be better if it had more features. When it comes to features, BMC tops the chart. When it comes to usage, people use BMC more.""We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system.""Service Manager would be improved with access to automation."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of the license for SMAX varies depending on the configuration, including the number of seats for users and the customer's specific requirements. It's not a fixed cost and can vary."
  • More OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."
  • "Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."
  • "The license is not cheap."
  • "I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."
  • "HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."
  • More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:In my company, our customers need OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) for service management, which may either be for ESM or ITSM.
    Top Answer:The product is difficult to maintain, especially when moving from the previous version to the latest version. I suggest that OpenText needs a person with very good experience to take care of the… more »
    Top Answer:The product's technical support services need improvement.
    Top Answer:We use the product for infrastructure, profile, and incident management.
    Ranking
    Views
    972
    Comparisons
    335
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    467
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    1,314
    Comparisons
    892
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OpenText Service Manager, Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX)
    Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager
    Learn More
    Interactive Demo
    Overview

    OpenText™ SMAX is a SaaS-based solution that delivers a smart approach to IT and enterprise service management with built-in analytics, codeless configurations, and private generative AI chatbots.

    OpenText SMAX delivers a smart approach to service management, with full capabilities for IT service management (ITSM), IT asset management (ITAM), and enterprise service management (ESM). Empower users to self-resolve common requests with private generative AI chatbots that offer human-like responses. Give your team what they need—ITIL best-practice templates, codeless configurations, and built-in AI and analytics for automating workflows, improving processes, and solving issues. With SaaS deployment, SMAX eliminates the hassle of installation, maintenance, and upgrade. What’s more, SMAX offers flexible and affordable licensing that adapts to your business needs and saves you money.

    SMAX has a flexible and transparent pricing model that lets you change license allocations or add capabilities without costly surprises. Pricing starts at $79 per agent per month for a full range of processes and features that include a service portal, mobile app, AI, analytics, federated CMDB, ITSM, ESM, discovery, and orchestration. Visit the OpenText ITSM SaaS pricing page for details.

    Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

    Sample Customers
    Zurich Airport, Envirosuite, Norsk Helsenett, Achmea, University of Milan, World Vision, Petroleum Development Oman, Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories (TJDFT).
    resultspositive, Globicon
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Service Management (ITSM)
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) is ranked 16th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 4 reviews while OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is ranked 12th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 48 reviews. OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) is rated 8.0, while OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) writes "Offers a range of tools for sales and configuration that can be used in banks and telecom companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Service Manager [EOL] writes "A solution that works out of the box. The solution's real strength is its ability to change for your organization's infrastructure". OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) is most compared with JIRA Service Management, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, Ivanti Neurons for ITSM and Clarity SM, whereas OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, BMC Helix ITSM and IBM Maximo.

    See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

    We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.