We performed a comparison between OpenText Service Manager [EOL] and ServiceNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in IT Service Management (ITSM).
"Technical support is pretty good."
"It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents."
"It can adapt to any process in the organization."
"It's pretty well-structured in modules."
"It's easy to scale."
"Service Manager gives us a single system where everything is centralized in one base."
"The workflow engine that standardizes and globalizes the process steps. It drives people through the process by standardization and automation."
"Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013."
"For change management, I find the CAB workbench very useful. I haven't seen any other solution that has a CAB workbench or advanced automated solutions for a change advisory board. ServiceNow also has the Workflow Engine which works very well and is very intuitive."
"SPM and ITSM features are the most helpful."
"This solution is a single-storage for our user community to submit help desk tickets."
"There are lots of modules around IT service management such as IT business management and human resource management (HRC)."
"ServiceNow is a cloud-based platform, so people won't need to worry about investing on hardware to host it. Being on the cloud, it is available 24x7. It's scalable, stable, and multifeatured, with a straightforward setup and good technical support."
"I really like ServiceNow and all of the features. The way incident management is built is very helpful. You have a lot of options to optimize it, customize it, and automate it. You also have a lot of options for reporting. There are plenty of possibilities to do preference management within your customer CMDB file. These are very useful features, which I missed in BMC Remedy ITSM. ServiceNow is the best ticketing tool I have used so far."
"I like the incident module, which is useful for tracking your incidents and other things. It is a reliable solution."
"I find the incident management part to be the most valuable. That's how the service desk tracks tickets."
"The interface could be better."
"The user interface is very clunky. It's only now beginning to be a web-based interface, but for now it's still very clunky."
"Their end-user interface and technical support features could be improved."
"Micro Focus Service Manager is not very great. It would be better if it had more features. When it comes to features, BMC tops the chart. When it comes to usage, people use BMC more."
"The solution does not interface well with other products and is difficult to implement."
"Pure cloud-based native functionality is lacking."
"We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system."
"I think one area which is the most painful from my point of view is if you need to integrate a lot of the tools, and being able to make that a lot more seamless."
"It's not very secure, it's web-based, and I prefer Remedy. Both the security and the web interface could be improved."
"The Software Asset Management feature can be improved. We would like to see more features for the Software Asset Management functionality. Its price can also be better. It is currently more expensive than other solutions."
"Before implementing this solution, you should have the ITSM model in place for chain management requests. That is a prerequisite because you cannot perform tasks without it."
"I would like the reporting aspect to be better, including the graphs. It could have some way for us to easily to export to a csv or spreadsheet so that if a graph cannot be provided by ServiceNow itself, we would be able to use other applications to create them. Also, if there was a feature that enabled us to interact with end users directly from ServiceNow, like an instant-messaging type of feature, that would be great."
"We would like to have an Asset Management and/or Project Management feature enabled in this version and in the IT Service Management edition."
"The pricing of the solution could be better. It's a bit high."
"Performance could be improved."
"It's missing monitoring capabilities."
More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is ranked 12th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 48 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 212 reviews. OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText Service Manager [EOL] writes "A solution that works out of the box. The solution's real strength is its ability to change for your organization's infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is most compared with JIRA Service Management, OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX), BMC Helix ITSM and IBM Maximo, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and Appian.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
