We performed a comparison between Oracle Content Management and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."
"For any organization with more than one person in it, if they are trying to organize things to let people in the company know what others are doing, then this solution is good for them."
"Its functionality is enormous."
"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution."
"Its most valuable feature is the document library."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"Using SharePoint is difficult."
"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc."
"The initial setup process is not intuitive."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"Annoyingly, many new Office 365 apps always end up being only US locale for the first year of their life. Microsoft needs to realise that most of their customers are not in the USA."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"Processing data from multiple site collections is not easy as they reside in different databases."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive, Alfresco and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
