We performed a comparison between PeopleStrong and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI and UX are fantastic."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
"It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"I like the talent, recruitment, and learning features the most."
"The most valuable feature, in my view, is the level of exceptions or error messages that come back when something goes wrong."
"The master data where most of the reports were run from was the most valuable. We were quite satisfied with this module."
"The integration between the different models like personnel administration, work management, payroll, and time management are the most valuable and key features."
"It is a pretty stable solution."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The valuable features of SAP HCM include managing employee data from hiring to retirement."
"Recently, the localization versions for different countries were increased, and that added value to the solution."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
"Sometimes, we feel that we should have an API-based integration aspect."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"SAP HCM's long and tedious transactions can be improved."
"The product's license is very expensive."
"The talent modules are lacking in HCM, so I would recommend switching to SuccessFactors for talent management, but HCM excels at time management and payroll."
"The product's learning and development features could be better, including new exclusive LMS tools."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"The implementation of the solution can be a bit difficult. They should make it easier. If it could be as simple as the SuccessFactors implementation that would be ideal."
"A better user interface and greater AI integration are crucial."
"It would be nice if the solution migrated to S/4HANA."
PeopleStrong is ranked 13th in Talent Management with 7 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Talent Management with 47 reviews. PeopleStrong is rated 7.6, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of PeopleStrong writes "Simple, easy to access and interface is quite user-friendly. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". PeopleStrong is most compared with PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, DarwinBox, ZingHR and Oracle HCM Cloud, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and Oracle Payroll. See our PeopleStrong vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.