We performed a comparison between QAD Cloud ERP and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."
"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."
"The Fiori design is a valuable feature."
"SAP S/4HANA is the preferred database because of its scalability, faster accessibility, compatibility, and other well-suited features for large data sets."
"It is the most stable solution provided by SAP and can be used on all levels."
"One of the most valuable features is the in-memory database."
"The in-memory processing capability is most valuable."
"S4HANA is a completely integrated solution. It's an end-to-end ERP system with strong manufacturing and financial integration, which is not common among ERPs. And it's a solution that's driven by industry best practices."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S/4HANA is the innovational process. We are able to receive more efficiency or accuracy than previous versions."
"In terms of its most valuable feature, I would say the finance module."
"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."
"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."
"The initial setup could be better. They can make the process a little easier. The functions that we require will be available in the next release. We specifically need a new model, and I think we have some versions to implement. I already read on the SAP website that some functionalities we are waiting for are available in this new version."
"So, there is room for improvement in pricing. HANA is not a simple product; it's quite complex by design."
"While the solution contemplates a competitively priced model, its pricing could be cheaper."
"I'm not a big fan of SAP S/4HANA because it needs a lot of hardware. It is really fast, but it needs a lot of hardware. The hardware for S/4HANA is too expensive."
"In an upcoming release, it would be beneficial to have more practical intelligence in the system, such as protective maintenance, or artificial intelligence."
"The common issues being raised right now by the end users are mostly related to the usability."
"We found that the implementing partners themselves are struggling with S4HANA's features. It's not an exact translation of the older ECC, so SAP has taken a new route to do things with S4HANA. Maybe it's a good product, but the implementing partners also like to have an in-depth understanding of the full feature set the product offers."
"Their yearly licensing is expensive. Improvements are needed on the user experience level and digital work."
QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 24th in ERP with 2 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP ERP, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, NetSuite ERP and Epicor ERP, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.