QAD Cloud ERP vs SAP ERP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
QAD Logo
544 views|390 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
22,080 views|19,644 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between QAD Cloud ERP and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do.""It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."

More QAD Cloud ERP Pros →

"SAP ERP offers a wide range of functional modules, including payroll, HR, financials, and others.""The product connects to every software.""Overall the solution is very good in the industry.""The transactional integration of operations is the best-recommended feature of this product. It provides integration of all operational modules.""We like that we have real-time dashboard views.""It meets our requirements for what we need it to do in the manufacturing industry.""I like the solution’s features in finance, supply chain, sales, and distribution.""The most valuable feature is the robust workflows that SAP provides to us in our organization. Overall, I find it the best ERP solution compared to other similar solutions."

More SAP ERP Pros →

Cons
"The product lacks a lot of features and technology.""Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."

More QAD Cloud ERP Cons →

"Though SAP ERP's FICO module is a strong part of the product, its integration capabilities can be made stronger.""Presently, the solution's interface is not intuitive.""Poor ergonomics.""Lacks sufficient technical support with slow response times.""Technical support could be better.""The flexibility in using the software could improve. I am from a product background and I've been testing a lot of applications, for example, Informatics. The UI, features, and cloud version could improve.""It should be less complex. It should also have better integration capability. I am using the ACC version, and in this version, the integration and the communication are very difficult and complicated.""SAP needs to be more intuitive."

More SAP ERP Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "SAP ECC is not cheap but I consider it the best system for managing an organization's data and processes."
  • "This is a costly product."
  • "There are licensing costs."
  • "Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have."
  • "The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive."
  • "SAP is a bit on the costly side, but they also provide support and other things. We are paying for licenses and the use of the cloud."
  • "SAP ERP is expensive."
  • "When you have a solution that is stable, reliable, and has a high performance as this solution, the price is going to be expensive. However, when you evaluate the service you are paying for the cost is quite reasonable for this solution."
  • More SAP ERP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with.
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing an eight out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:The product lacks a lot of features and technology. It is really limited. The tool must improve in almost all areas. There are a lot of things that should be improved in the manufacturing and shop… more »
    Top Answer:There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of codes… more »
    Top Answer:The product can be a little slow when dealing with thousands of employee data.
    Ranking
    24th
    out of 69 in ERP
    Views
    544
    Comparisons
    390
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    530
    Rating
    5.0
    1st
    out of 69 in ERP
    Views
    22,080
    Comparisons
    19,644
    Reviews
    35
    Average Words per Review
    438
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    SAP S/4HANA logo
    Compared 32% of the time.
    Microsoft Dynamics AX logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Anaplan logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SAP Business One logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Infor M3 logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    MFG/PRO
    Learn More
    Overview

    QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.

    SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.
    Sample Customers
    Tower International, Kendra Scott
    B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Educational Organization9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Pharma/Biotech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization6%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise46%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 24th in ERP with 2 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP S/4HANA, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, NetSuite ERP and Epicor ERP, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and Infor M3. See our QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP report.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.