We performed a comparison between Box and Citrix ShareFile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Content Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The system's performance is impressive, and file sharing is notably straightforward."
"It is a very user-friendly product."
"The collaboration of the solution is good."
"Box is extremely stable, they have not been hacked or lost any data in the past seventeen years. I am very impressed with it."
"The most valuable feature of Box is security."
"The application is very light in terms of uploading and downloading files."
"I like the ease of use."
"Sharing and collaborating across files and folders has been a massive game changer."
"The Enterprise Dropbox solution is highly integrated with Microsoft's Office 365 and Azure products."
"The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically."
"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords."
"It's user-friendly for end users."
"Easy to manage and fully secure."
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
"The solution is scalable."
"ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."
"One thing that Box would benefit from is a records management component."
"The upload speed needs improvement."
"I would love to see the ability to invite collaborators extended to a file level, not just the folder level."
"I recommend doing the trial first, because it's not cheap ware. It's not overly expensive, but it's not cheap ware, and enterprise has a minimum number of users."
"I don't like the low level of role-based security it provides – it's very cumbersome, and the support is ordinary at times."
"Like all cloud platforms, there are always areas of improvement around sync to local devices."
"Data privacy, regarding where to store your data: Offering several transparent(!) options (where to store my data and whether to sync back or not and where to sync) regarding the local law situations (USA, EU, Switzerland!) would increase the credibility of a US based company (after NSA ‘snooping’)."
"Better integration with other solutions is needed."
"The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application."
"DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices."
"The user interface is not very intuitive."
"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."
"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."
"There are sometimes scalability issues after updates."
"They should integrate the solution with more email services."
"My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved."
Box is ranked 2nd in Content Collaboration Platforms with 37 reviews while Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Box writes "Used for data storage and data collaboration, but its data security could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, Egnyte and IBM FileNet, whereas Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365 and Egnyte. See our Box vs. Citrix ShareFile report.
See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.